How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Unitization of a nonunital Banach algebra
Example
Let be a nonunital complex Banach algebra: a complex Banach space (Banach space) with an associative bilinear multiplication satisfying and no unit. Define
Then is a unital complex Banach algebra (Unital Banach algebra) with unit , the map is an isometric algebra homomorphism whose image is a closed two-sided ideal isomorphic to , and spectra of elements of are taken in this unitization: for ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonunital complex Banach algebra with norm , and the algebra with the multiplication and norm displayed above.
is complete, multiplication in is associative and bilinear with , and for the scalars understood as multiples of the unit in the unital case; in the nonunital case there is no unit and (Unital Banach algebra, Banach space).
In a unital complex Banach algebra is invertible exactly when it has a two-sided inverse, and exactly when is not invertible (Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra).
Verification
Associativity: expanding both sides of the associativity identity for and by bilinearity gives the common value the left side produces and the right side produces , and the two agree because scalars may be moved across the product, the multiplication of is bilinear, and by associativity.
The element is a two-sided identity: and . Submultiplicativity holds because by [L1], and .
Completeness: a sequence is Cauchy in the sum norm exactly when is Cauchy in and is Cauchy in (the two inequalities compare the norm with the maximum of the coordinate norms); since and are complete by [L1], the coordinates converge and their pair is the limit; so is a complex Banach algebra.
The map is isometric and multiplicative: , and ; its image is a two-sided ideal because and , and it is closed as the kernel of the continuous scalar projection .
By [L2] applied in , the spectrum of is the set of with not invertible, which is the convention displayed in the statement.
Remarks
-
The algebraic unitization is canonical, but its Banach norm is not. The algebra contains as a closed two-sided ideal of codimension one, and the displayed multiplication is the usual algebraic unitization. The sum norm is one convenient submultiplicative complete norm; merely requiring another unitization to restrict to the norm of and to have unit norm one does not force an isometry with this sum-norm model.
-
Why the convention is needed at all. Without a unit the expressions in the definition of the spectrum are meaningless inside ; the named unitization supplies the missing , and the example fixes it so that no later statement has to guess which unitization was meant.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Vahid Shirbisheh, Lectures on C-star Algebras, v2 — Definition 2.1.18, printed pp. 11–13 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — §5.1.1, printed pp. 209–214 (standard reference, not scraped)