Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Unitization of a nonunital Banach algebra

Example

Let A be a nonunital complex Banach algebra: a complex Banach space (Banach space) with an associative bilinear multiplication satisfying abab and no unit. Define

A~:=CA,(λ,a)(μ,b):=(λμ, λb+μa+ab),(λ,a):=λ+a.

Then A~ is a unital complex Banach algebra (Unital Banach algebra) with unit (1,0), the map a(0,a) is an isometric algebra homomorphism whose image is a closed two-sided ideal isomorphic to A, and spectra of elements of A are taken in this unitization: for aA,

σ(a):=σA~((0,a))={λC:(λ,a) is not invertible in A~}

(Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonunital complex Banach algebra A with norm , and the algebra A~=CA with the multiplication and norm displayed above.

[L1]

A is complete, multiplication in A is associative and bilinear with abab, and z=z for the scalars understood as multiples of the unit in the unital case; in the nonunital case there is no unit and 1A (Unital Banach algebra, Banach space).

[L2]

In a unital complex Banach algebra c is invertible exactly when it has a two-sided inverse, and λσ(c) exactly when λ1c is not invertible (Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Associativity: expanding both sides of the associativity identity for ((λ,a)(μ,b))(ν,c) and (λ,a)((μ,b)(ν,c)) by bilinearity gives the common value (λμν, λμc+λνb+μνa+λ(bc)+μ(ac)+ν(ab)+(ab)c): the left side produces λμc+ν(λb+μa+ab)+(λb+μa+ab)c and the right side produces λ(μc+νb+bc)+μνa+a(μc+νb+bc), and the two agree because scalars may be moved across the product, the multiplication of A is bilinear, and a(bc)=(ab)c by associativity.

L1algebra
2.1

The element (1,0) is a two-sided identity: (1,0)(μ,b)=(μ,b+0+0)=(μ,b) and (λ,a)(1,0)=(λ,0+a+0)=(λ,a). Submultiplicativity holds because (λ,a)(μ,b)=λμ+λb+μa+abλμ+λb+μa+ab=(λ+a)(μ+b)=(λ,a)(μ,b) by [L1], and (1,0)=1.

step 1.1L1algebra
3.1

Completeness: a sequence (λn,an) is Cauchy in the sum norm exactly when (λn) is Cauchy in C and (an) is Cauchy in A (the two inequalities λ,a(λ,a)λ+a compare the norm with the maximum of the coordinate norms); since C and A are complete by [L1], the coordinates converge and their pair is the limit; so A~ is a complex Banach algebra.

step 2.1L1algebra
3.2

The map j(a):=(0,a) is isometric and multiplicative: j(ab)=(0,ab)=(0,a)(0,b)=j(a)j(b), and j(a)=0+a; its image is a two-sided ideal because (λ,b)(0,a)=(0,λa+ba) and (0,a)(μ,b)=(0,μa+ab), and it is closed as the kernel of the continuous scalar projection (λ,a)λ.

step 2.1L1algebra
4.1

By [L2] applied in A~, the spectrum of aA is the set of λ with (λ,0)(0,a)=(λ,a) not invertible, which is the convention displayed in the statement.

step 3.1step 3.2L2

Remarks

  • The algebraic unitization is canonical, but its Banach norm is not. The algebra A~ contains A as a closed two-sided ideal of codimension one, and the displayed multiplication is the usual algebraic unitization. The sum norm is one convenient submultiplicative complete norm; merely requiring another unitization to restrict to the norm of A and to have unit norm one does not force an isometry with this sum-norm model.

  • Why the convention is needed at all. Without a unit the expressions z1a in the definition of the spectrum are meaningless inside A; the named unitization supplies the missing 1, and the example fixes it so that no later statement has to guess which unitization was meant.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources