How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Single shooting amplifies an initial-slope error on a decaying-mode BVP
Example
For , consider on with and . In first-order form the state is with , , and the square boundary map is . The scalar solution component stays in , but changing the unknown initial slope by changes the terminal value by . The factor exceeds one for every and is unbounded as increases, so a small initial-slope error can be strongly amplified by single shooting.
Verification
Given: , first-order state , boundary map , and an exact IVP evaluator so that the shooting residual is the exact terminal boundary residual.
[F1] Square nonlinear two-point boundary-value problems and endpoint residuals: the BVP is a first-order system with a square endpoint residual.
[F2] Certified differentiable IVP approximation interface for shooting: an exact flow can be used as an endpoint evaluator with error bound zero.
[F3] Finite-budget single shooting for a nonlinear two-point BVP: single shooting applies finite-budget Newton to the endpoint residual when this evaluator is used.
The substitution gives with and . Solving this constant-coefficient equation gives , so because increases from to . Its initial slope is .
If the initial slope is while remains fixed, linearity of the equation for gives . Subtracting the exact shot yields .
Since has value zero at and derivative for , we have . Also the derivative of has numerator , where and ; hence is increasing. For , , so . The perturbed terminal boundary residual vector changes by , while [F2]–[F3] identify this as the endpoint residual evaluated by exact single shooting.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- T. A. Driscoll and R. J. Braun, Fundamentals of Numerical Computation, Chapter 10 (standard reference, not scraped)
- R. Verfürth, Numerical Methods and Stochastics, Part I: Numerical Methods, Lecture Notes (standard reference, not scraped)