Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Veronese linear system on the Riemann sphere

Example

Let X=C^=P1(C) with affine coordinate z=z1/z0 and point at infinity [0:1]. Fix an integer d≥1, put D=d[∞], and let E=OX(D). Then:

  1. L(D) is the space of polynomials of degree at most d, so ℓ(D)=d+1. The sections sj:=zjsD for 0≤j≤d, where sD is the canonical meromorphic section of OX(D), form a basis.

  2. This basis is base-point-free. Its linear-system map is φd:P1⟶Pd,[z0:z1]⟼[z0d:z0d−1z1:⋯:z1d], and φd∗OPd(1)≅OX(D).

  3. The map is a holomorphic embedding. Its image is the degree-d rational normal curve, the image of the degree-d Veronese parametrization.

Verification

Given: The Riemann sphere X, its standard charts, the divisor D=d[∞] with d≥1, and the line bundle E=OX(D).

[F1] The finite chart has coordinate z and the chart at infinity has coordinate u=1/z (The standard holomorphic charts on the Riemann sphere, with holomorphy and poles at infinity).

[F2] Projective space parametrizes lines and has the standard homogeneous-coordinate charts Uj={Zj≠0} (Complex projective space and its holomorphic charts).

[F3] Every meromorphic function on the sphere is a rational function P/Q with coprime polynomials (Meromorphic functions on the Riemann sphere are exactly the rational functions).

[F4] A nonconstant complex polynomial of degree n has exactly n roots counted with multiplicity (A complex polynomial of degree n has exactly n roots counted with multiplicity).

[F5] A nonzero meromorphic function lies in L(D) exactly when (f)+D≥0 (Divisors, principal divisors and canonical divisors on a Riemann surface).

[F6] The canonical meromorphic section sD of E has divisor D, and h↦hsD identifies L(D) with H0(X,E); the divisor of hsD is (h)+D (The holomorphic line bundle associated to a divisor).

[F7] A base-point-free finite-dimensional subspace of holomorphic sections defines a holomorphic map to the projectivized dual space, and dual evaluation identifies the line bundle with the pullback of O(1), sending each chosen section to its coordinate section (The map defined by a base-point-free linear system).

[F8] The standard projective space Pn(C) is compact and Hausdorff (Complex projective space and its holomorphic charts).

Choice audit: No full AC or ACω is used. The sphere and target use their explicit finite standard chart covers; the basis is displayed explicitly; and the compact case of the O(D) construction uses its finite-cover, choice-free branch (The holomorphic line bundle associated to a divisor).

Proof technique: direct calculation in the two affine charts.

1.1F1F3F4F5givenalgebra

The zero function is a polynomial. For nonzero f∈L(D), [F3] writes f=P/Q with P,Q coprime. If Q were nonconstant, [F4] would give a root a∈C; if P(a)=0, the same factorization result would make z−a divide both P and Q, contrary to coprimeness. Thus P(a)≠0 and f has a finite pole at a, impossible for f∈L(d[∞]). Hence Q is constant. If P has degree m, its expression in u=1/z has leading term cu−m, so its pole order at infinity is m; membership in L(D) forces m≤d. Conversely every polynomial of degree at most d has no finite poles and pole order at infinity at most d, so belongs to L(D). The monomials are linearly independent as polynomials and span this space, proving the dimension and basis claims.

2.1F5F6F7step 1.1given

By [F6], sj=zjsD has divisor (zj)+D=j[0]+(d−j)[∞], since z has a simple zero at 0 and a simple pole at ∞. At every finite point s0=sD is nonzero because its divisor is d[∞]; at infinity sd is nonzero because its divisor is d[0]. Thus the basis sections have no common zero. Since d+1≥2, [F7] applies to V=H0(X,E) and gives the asserted linear-system map and pullback isomorphism.

3.1F1F2F5F6F7step 2.1algebra

On the source chart z0≠0, the section sD is a local frame and the coefficients of sj are zj, so the map has coordinates [1:z:⋯:zd]. On the chart z1≠0, the coordinate is u=z0/z1=1/z and sd=zdsD is a local frame because its divisor is d[0]; the coefficients of s0,…,sd in this frame are ud,ud−1,…,1. Hence the map is [ud:ud−1:⋯:1] there. On the overlap, multiplying [1:z:⋯:zd] by ud gives the second tuple, so the formulas agree and are holomorphic in both charts; together they give the stated homogeneous formula on all of P1.

4.1F1F2F4step 1.1step 3.1algebra

In the finite chart, the target chart coordinates are (z,z2,…,zd), whose first coordinate recovers z and whose derivative has first component 1. In the chart at infinity, the target coordinates are (ud,ud−1,…,u), whose last coordinate recovers u and whose derivative has last component 1. The point at infinity maps to [0:⋯:0:1], outside the target chart with first coordinate nonzero, while every finite point lies in that chart. Thus the map is globally injective and has nonzero differential at every point. For any nonzero hyperplane form L(W)=∑j=0dajWj, monomial independence from step 1.1 shows its pullback ∑j=0dajz0d−jz1j is a nonzero homogeneous polynomial of degree d. If its dehomogenization on z0≠0 has degree m≤d, [F4] gives m finite roots counted with multiplicity, and in the infinity coordinate it has a zero of order d−m when m<d; hence every hyperplane section has total multiplicity d. Under the hyperplane-section definition of degree, the image is the rational normal curve of degree d.

5.1F8F9step 4.1givenalgebra∎

The chart formulas show that φd is continuous. If C⊆P1 is closed, [F9] makes C compact; pulling any open cover of φd(C) back along φd gives an open cover of C, so compactness gives a finite subcover and φd(C) is compact. The target Pd is Hausdorff by [F8], so [F9] makes φd(C) closed. Hence the continuous bijection from P1 onto its image is closed and has continuous inverse. Together with the nonzero differential from step 4.1, this proves that φd is a holomorphic embedding, including the case d=1.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

50 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources