ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22

How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Weyl integration for SU(2)

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For a continuous class function $f$ on $S U (2)$ , $\int_{S U (2)} f (g) d g = \frac{1}{2} \int_{S^{1}} f (diag (z, z^{- 1})) ∣ 1 - z^{- 2} ∣^{2} d z,$ with $d z$ the normalized Haar measure of the circle.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume the Axiom of Choice; $S U (2)$ with its diagonal maximal torus $T = {diag (z, z^{- 1}) : ∣ z ∣ = 1}$ , Weyl group of order two, and normalized Haar measures.

[L1]

The diagonal matrices form a maximal torus of $S U (2)$ with Weyl group $W ≅ S_{2}$ of order two acting by $z \mapsto z^{- 1}$ (Maximal tori and Weyl groups of U(n) and SU(n)).

[L2]

Weyl integration: for a class function $f$ on a compact connected $G$ with maximal torus $T$ , $\int_{G} f d g = ∣ W ∣^{- 1} \int_{T} f (t) J (t) d t$ with $J (t) = \prod_{α > 0} ∣ 1 - α (t)^{- 1} ∣^{2}$ (Weyl integration formula, Weyl Jacobian).

[L3]

In ${s l}_{2} (C)$ , the adjoint action of $t = diag (z, z^{- 1})$ sends $E_{12}$ to $z^{2} E_{12}$ and $E_{21}$ to $z^{- 2} E_{21}$ , while it fixes the diagonal trace-zero line. Thus the roots of $(S U (2), T)$ are the two characters $z \mapsto z^{\pm 2}$ , and one may choose $α (t) = z^{2}$ as the positive root. [algebra]

Verification

technique · direct

1.1

Substituting $∣ W ∣ = 2$ into [L2] and using that the class function is constant on Weyl orbits gives $\int_{S U (2)} f d g = \frac{1}{2} \int_{S^{1}} f (diag (z, z^{- 1})) J (diag (z, z^{- 1})) d z$ .

L1L2

2.1

By [L3] the single positive root satisfies $α (diag (z, z^{- 1})) = z^{2}$ , so $J (diag (z, z^{- 1})) = ∣ 1 - z^{- 2} ∣^{2}$ , which is the displayed factor.

L3step 1.1

3.1

As a check, $f \equiv 1$ gives $\frac{1}{2} \int_{S^{1}} ∣ 1 - z^{- 2} ∣^{2} d z = \frac{1}{2} \int_{S^{1}} (2 - z^{2} - z^{- 2}) d z = \frac{1}{2} \cdot 2 = 1$ , consistent with the normalization of Haar measure.

step 2.1∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources

Brian Conrad and Aaron Landesman, Compact Lie Groups (standard reference, not scraped)
Anthony W. Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)