How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For a monoid action, Yoneda says that an equivariant map from the regular action is determined by the identity element
Example
Let be a monoid with identity , viewed as the one-object category . A functor is a set with a left -action. The representable is the left regular action of on itself, and Yoneda becomes the bijection
with inverse .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A monoid , its one-object category , and a functor .
A monoid has associative multiplication and a two-sided identity (Semigroup and monoid).
Every monoid is a one-object category (A monoid is a one-object category, and a group is a one-object category in which every morphism is invertible). This example fixes the resulting data explicitly: , and composition is taken to be , the convention that makes the represented functor a left action.
Sets and functions form the category (Sets and functions form the large locally small category ).
Evaluation at the identity is a bijection whose inverse sends to the natural transformation with component (Evaluation at the identity gives and proves that the natural-transformation collection is a set), and it is natural in the represented object and in the target functor (The Yoneda bijection is natural in both and ).
A natural transformation has components commuting with the action of every source morphism (Natural transformation and its components).
Verification
Put . Functoriality and [L1] give and , so this is a left action.
The covariant representable has value and sends to postcomposition , so it is the left regular action.
A natural transformation is a function satisfying for all , exactly equivariance for the two left actions.
If is equivariant, then . Conversely, for , the function satisfies by step 1.1 and has .
Step 3.1 proves directly that evaluation at and are inverse. These are precisely the formulas in [L2], whose target-functor naturality says that the bijection commutes with every equivariant map of -sets.
Depends on
- Evaluation at the identity gives $\operatorname{Nat}(\mathcal C(a,-),F)\cong F(a)$ and proves that the natural-transformation collection is a set
- The Yoneda bijection $\operatorname{Nat}(\mathcal C(a,-),F)\cong F(a)$ is natural in both $a$ and $F$
- A monoid is a one-object category, and a group is a one-object category in which every morphism is invertible
- Sets and functions form the large locally small category $\mathbf{Set}$
- Semigroup and monoid
- Natural transformation and its components
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 36 results over 13 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emily Riehl, Category Theory in Context, Proposition 2.2.3 and Theorem 2.2.4 (standard reference, not scraped)