How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Young permutation characteristic for shape
Example
For , the Young permutation module has , and its character takes the values on cycle types , decomposing as ; this agrees with Young's rule and with the dictionary table.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The partition of , the cycle types of , and a permutation .
, where is the character of , and (The characteristic of a Young permutation character is complete homogeneous, Elementary and complete families freely generate the stable ring).
is the number of -tabloids fixed by (The character of a permutation representation counts fixed points).
Young's rule: , with the number of semistandard -tableaux of content (Young's rule for complex permutation modules, Semistandard tableaux and Kostka numbers).
For partitions of the same integer, with unless and (The Kostka change of basis is dominance-unitriangular).
In the dictionary example for , , , with and on the cycle types (The Frobenius characteristic dictionary for ).
Verification
Listing the three -tabloids by their two-element row: , , . The identity fixes all three; the transposition fixes exactly , because a fixed tabloid must have both its row sets -invariant, and preserves and but moves to and to ; the -cycle fixes none, since a row set of size is never invariant under a -cycle. Hence on the cycle types .
By [F1], .
The Kostka numbers for are (the single semistandard tableau of shape ) and (the tableau with first row and second row ), while both because two entries equal to would have to occur in the same column and because does not dominate [F4]; so Young's rule [F3] gives .
By [F5] the dictionary example gives ; on the other hand , so . Therefore , and step 1.2 identifies this with .
Adding the values of and from [F5] gives on the cycle types , exactly the values computed for in step 1.1.
The two routes agree: directly, by step 2.2, matching the Young's-rule decomposition of step 1.3; symmetrically, by steps 1.2 and 2.1, matching the dictionary table of [F5].
Depends on
- The characteristic of a Young permutation character is complete homogeneous
- Young's rule for complex permutation modules
- The Kostka change of basis is dominance-unitriangular
- Semistandard tableaux and Kostka numbers
- The character of a permutation representation counts fixed points
- The Frobenius characteristic dictionary for $S_3$
- Elementary and complete families freely generate the stable ring
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- I. G. Macdonald, Symmetric Functions and Hall Polynomials, 2nd ed., Chapter I §7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- G. D. James, The Representation Theory of the Symmetric Groups, §6 (standard reference, not scraped)