How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The two extreme Young permutation modules
Example
For the two extreme partitions of give the two extreme Young permutation modules:
- for there is exactly one tabloid, so is one-dimensional, and every fixes that tabloid; hence is the trivial representation of ;
- for the row-equivalence classes are singletons and the tabloids are the tableaux of shape , so has a basis indexed by on which acts by left multiplication; hence is the regular representation .
The row module is generated by its single tabloid and the column module has dimension . For the two partitions coincide, , and both descriptions give the one-dimensional module; for the only partition is , there is one empty tabloid, and is again the one-dimensional trivial module, which is also the regular module of the trivial group .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: For , the partitions and of and their standard row-filled tableaux ; separately, for , the empty partition and empty tableau.
For the standard Young subgroup is the subgroup preserving each consecutive block of sizes ; the Young permutation module is the complex vector space with the tabloids of shape as basis, acting by ; the stabilizer of is and the stabilizer of the tabloid of the standard row-filled tableau is , so (Young subgroups, tabloids, and permutation modules).
For every there is an isomorphism of complex -modules , the permutation representation of on the left coset set , and hence ; this holds also for (Young permutation modules are induced trivial modules).
The trivial representation of a finite group over is the one-dimensional representation on in which every acts as the identity, and the regular representation is the representation on given by left multiplication by the basis units, (The trivial representation, the regular representation, and permutation representations from finite -sets).
Verification
For the blocks of [F1] are the single block , so , and every -tableau has the single row set ; hence any two -tableaux are row equivalent, there is exactly one tabloid, and is one-dimensional with that tabloid as basis.
For the blocks are the singletons , so , and the row set of row of a tableau is the singleton carrying its single entry, so two tableaux are row equivalent exactly when they agree entrywise and each tabloid is a singleton class; a -tableau is a bijection from the boxes onto , so there are of them, and the map from to the tableaux is a bijection, being injective because is surjective and surjective because defines a permutation, whence is a bijection onto the tabloids with for all .
For and any the tableau again has the single row set , so : every acts as the identity on the one-dimensional , which by [F3] is the trivial representation, in agreement with [F2] because is a single coset.
Transporting the basis along the bijection of step 1.2 turns the action of [F1] into left multiplication on , which by [F3] is the regular representation, so ; the coset description of [F2] reduces to the same statement because and the cosets are the singletons of .
For the two partitions coincide, , and both conclusions above give the same one-dimensional module; for the only partition is , whose tabloid set consists of the single empty tabloid, so is one-dimensional with trivial action and coincides with the regular module of the trivial group . Thus is the trivial module and the regular module for every , and for both descriptions give the same one-dimensional module. ∎
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charlotte Chan, Representation Theory of Symmetric Groups - Example 3.7(a)(b), printed p. 12 (PDF p. 13) (standard reference, not scraped)
- David Craven, Groups, Geometries and Representation Theory - Section 1.6, printed pp. 13-14 (PDF pp. 15-16) (standard reference, not scraped)