How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A bijective smooth map need not be a diffeomorphism
Statement
False claim: every bijective smooth map is a diffeomorphism.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The map , .
A smooth map is a continuous map whose coordinate representatives are smooth ( and smooth maps between smooth manifolds).
A diffeomorphism is a bijective smooth map whose inverse is also smooth (Diffeomorphisms and local diffeomorphisms of manifolds).
Refutation
The map is smooth on and bijective, with inverse [F1] .
The inverse is not differentiable at , because
for , and these derivatives are unbounded near . So is not smooth. [step 1.1]
By [F2], steps 1.1 and 2.1 show that is a bijective smooth map that is [F2, step 1.1, step 2.1] not a diffeomorphism.
Depends on
Used by
- A bijective smooth map with nonsmooth inverse Counterexample
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Nigel Hitchin, Differentiable Manifolds, §2.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Rob van der Vorst, Introduction to differentiable manifolds, §2 (standard reference, not scraped)