How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: every block is an invariant subset
Statement
Every block is an invariant subset.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The composite-degree dihedral action from Dihedral actions of prime and composite degree.
In the composite dihedral action, a residue class modulo a proper divisor is a block (Dihedral actions of prime and composite degree).
Refutation
In the action of on , the subset is a block by [L1].
The reflection sends to , which is disjoint from and not equal to it. So is a block but not an invariant subset.
This refutes the statement.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Group Theory, Chapter 4 (standard reference, not scraped)