How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: Every complex inner product satisfies
Statement
False claim. Every complex inner product satisfies .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Standard and the vectors , .
Complex inner products are conjugate symmetric: (Real and complex inner product spaces, with the inner product linear in the first argument).
The standard complex inner product is in one dimension (The standard formulas on and on are inner products).
Refutation
By [L2], , whereas . These are unequal.
They are complex conjugates, exactly as [L1] requires. Thus conjugate symmetry, not symmetry, is the correct law.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 32 results over 10 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Sheldon Axler, Linear Algebra Done Right, 4th ed., definition 6.2 (standard reference, not scraped)