How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: a convex function on a convex set is continuous
Statement
False claim: every convex real-valued function on a convex Euclidean domain is continuous at every domain point.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: No openness assumption is imposed.
There is a function on that is convex on but is not continuous at (A convex function on that is discontinuous at the boundary).
Refutation
The interval in [L1] is convex and the displayed function is convex on it.
The same function fails continuity at the boundary point zero by [L1], so it refutes the claim. Openness of the domain, or restriction to its interior, is essential.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization, §3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)