Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A countable elementary submodel need not be transitive

Statement

False statement: every countable elementary submodel of a transitive set is transitive. In ZFC there is a countable X≺Vθ with ω1∈X that is not transitive.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Hartogs: an ordinal that does not inject into a given set: For every set A there is an ordinal (def-ordinal) that does not inject into A, that is, admits no injective function into A. The least such ordinal is the Hartogs number ℵ(A), and it is exactly

ℵ(A)={ot(S,R):S⊆A and R well-orders S},

the set of order types (thm-mostowski-collapse) of the well-ordered subsets of A.

The proof is choice free. That is the whole point of the theorem: in ZF alone, with no assumption that A can be well ordered, one still gets an ordinal too long to be laid inside A.

[F2]

Countable elementary submodels and their collapses: In ZFC, if an infinite set membership structure M satisfies Extensionality, then for every at most countable A⊆M there is a countably infinite X≺M containing A, and X has a countable transitive collapse. To retain a set a∈M as one parameter, use A={a}.

[F3]

What the collapse fixes: Let π:X→Xˉ be a collapse of actual membership as above. It fixes every transitive subset A⊆X pointwise. If α∈X is an actual ordinal, π(α) is the order type of X∩α. In particular, if X∩α is transitive, π(α)=X∩α.

[F4]

The Axiom of Choice: Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function

Refutation

Given: Ambient ZFC and actual cumulative hierarchy stages.

1.1F1F2F4given

By F1 let κ be the least ordinal not injecting into ω, that is ω1. Choose θ=κ+ω. Then κ∈Vθ, the stage is infinite and transitive, and it satisfies Extensionality: any actual distinguishing member of two elements remains in the stage by transitivity. With AC as in F4, apply F2 to the parameter set {κ} to get a countable X≺Vθ containing κ.

2.1step 1.1algebra

If X were transitive, κ∈X would imply κ⊆X. Composing this inclusion with a countability injection X→ω would inject κ into ω, contradicting its definition. Thus this X satisfies the hypotheses of the proposed assertion and fails its conclusion.

3.1F3step 1.1step 2.1∎

F3 computes the collapse value of κ as ot⁡(X∩κ), a countable ordinal because the trace is countable. It cannot equal the uncountable κ. The transitive collapse is therefore a different membership presentation, as required.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources