Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A countable elementary submodel need not be transitive

Statement

False statement: every countable elementary submodel of a transitive set is transitive. In ZFC there is a countable XVθ with ω1X that is not transitive.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Hartogs: an ordinal that does not inject into a given set: For every set A there is an ordinal (def-ordinal) that does not inject into A, that is, admits no injective function into A. The least such ordinal is the Hartogs number (A), and it is exactly

(A)={ot(S,R):SA and R well-orders S},

the set of order types (thm-mostowski-collapse) of the well-ordered subsets of A.

The proof is choice free. That is the whole point of the theorem: in ZF alone, with no assumption that A can be well ordered, one still gets an ordinal too long to be laid inside A.

[F2]

Countable elementary submodels and their collapses: In ZFC, if an infinite set membership structure M satisfies Extensionality, then for every at most countable AM there is a countably infinite XM containing A, and X has a countable transitive collapse. To retain a set aM as one parameter, use A={a}.

[F3]

What the collapse fixes: Let π:XXˉ be a collapse of actual membership as above. It fixes every transitive subset AX pointwise. If αX is an actual ordinal, π(α) is the order type of Xα. In particular, if Xα is transitive, π(α)=Xα.

[F4]

The Axiom of Choice: Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function

Refutation

Given: Ambient ZFC and actual cumulative hierarchy stages.

1.1

By F1 let κ be the least ordinal not injecting into ω, that is ω1. Choose θ=κ+ω. Then κVθ, the stage is infinite and transitive, and it satisfies Extensionality: any actual distinguishing member of two elements remains in the stage by transitivity. With AC as in F4, apply F2 to the parameter set {κ} to get a countable XVθ containing κ.

F1F2F4given
2.1

If X were transitive, κX would imply κX. Composing this inclusion with a countability injection Xω would inject κ into ω, contradicting its definition. Thus this X satisfies the hypotheses of the proposed assertion and fails its conclusion.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

F3 computes the collapse value of κ as ot(Xκ), a countable ordinal because the trace is countable. It cannot equal the uncountable κ. The transitive collapse is therefore a different membership presentation, as required.

F3step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources