How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: preserving zero morphisms is enough for additivity
Statement
False claim: a functor between additive categories is additive whenever it preserves zero morphisms.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The functor sending an abelian group to the reduced free abelian group on its underlying pointed set.
Every additive functor preserves zero morphisms (An additive functor preserves zero morphisms).
Refutation
If is the zero homomorphism, then the induced set map on underlying pointed sets sends every element to the basepoint . Therefore sends every generator to , so preserves zero morphisms.
Let . In write for the class of the generator . Then , while . These are distinct elements of the free abelian group on the nonzero integers, so .
Thus preserves zero morphisms without being additive, refuting the claim.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Freyd, Abelian Categories, Exercise 2A (standard reference, not scraped)