How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A short exact sequence of vector bundles has a canonical splitting
Statement
Every short exact sequence of smooth vector bundles has a canonical splitting.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The displayed claim.
The explicit sequence below has splittings, but none is invariant under all of its automorphisms.
Refutation
Consider the split exact sequence of trivial line bundles over any nonempty manifold , , where the first map is and the second is projection to the second coordinate. The map is an explicit smooth splitting.
For every , the bundle automorphism fixes the included first summand and commutes with projection to the second summand, so it is an automorphism of the exact sequence in step 1.1. Every splitting has the form for a smooth function , while . Thus no splitting is fixed by all automorphisms of the sequence: taking moves every candidate. A splitting determined canonically by the sequence would have to be invariant under these automorphisms, so none exists.
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · 0 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds (standard reference, not scraped)
- Will J. Merry, Differential Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)