How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: If the minimal polynomial splits, then the endomorphism is diagonalisable
Statement
False claim. If the minimal polynomial of an endomorphism splits over the base field, then the endomorphism is diagonalisable.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The matrix .
Diagonalisability requires the minimal polynomial to be a product of distinct linear factors (An endomorphism is diagonalisable if and only if its minimal polynomial is a product of distinct linear factors).
Splitting permits repeated linear factors (Polynomials that split and splitting fields of a polynomial or a family of polynomials).
Refutation
One has but , so . This polynomial splits by [L2], but its root is repeated.
By [L1], is not diagonalisable. Thus splitting alone is insufficient; squarefreeness is the missing condition.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 31 results over 6 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Keith Conrad, The Minimal Polynomial and Some Applications, Theorem 4.11 (standard reference, not scraped)