Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: If the minimal polynomial splits, then the endomorphism is diagonalisable

Statement

False claim. If the minimal polynomial of an endomorphism splits over the base field, then the endomorphism is diagonalisable.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The matrix J=(1101).

[L1]

Diagonalisability requires the minimal polynomial to be a product of distinct linear factors (An endomorphism is diagonalisable if and only if its minimal polynomial is a product of distinct linear factors).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1L2algebra

One has (J−I)2=0 but J−I≠0, so μJ=(x−1)2. This polynomial splits by [L2], but its root is repeated.

2.1step 1.1L1∎

By [L1], J is not diagonalisable. Thus splitting alone is insufficient; squarefreeness is the missing condition.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources