How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An isomorphism on e infinity automatically gives an isomorphism of unfiltered targets
Statement
False: An isomorphism on automatically makes a compatible unfiltered target map an isomorphism, without finite or complete separated filtration hypotheses.
Facts & Assumptions
Countable sequence groups and tail filtrations constructs the inclusion of finite-support into all binary sequences, with separated tails, common completion and finite quotient identifications.
R page of the spectral sequence of a filtered complex gives the graded initial page; The filtered differential induces d r on the r page gives its differentials from the chain differential. Failure of separatedness or completeness can destroy the claimed abutment establishes the possible failure of recovery from these pages.
Spectral sequence comparison theorem requires compatible target maps and finite or exhaustive separated complete target filtrations for its lifting conclusion.
Refutation
Given: The inclusion of complexes concentrated in degree zero, filtered by for and the whole group for positive indices.
The induced graded map at is the identity on via the coordinate identification . All positive graded pieces are zero. Since both chain differentials vanish, every page differential is zero and these identifications persist on every page, including at positions . The homology targets are and themselves, with the same tails, and the induced target map is the inclusion. Its graded maps are precisely the page maps, so compatibility is satisfied.
The constant-one sequence in is not in , so this compatible target map is not surjective. Both filtrations are exhaustive ( is full) and separated, but the source completion map is this same proper inclusion , hence is not an isomorphism. Thus the finite or complete-target lifting premise of [F3] fails on the source, while the limiting-page isomorphism holds. The index and zero positive levels were included in step 1.1, and the counterexample is choice-free.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Chapter 5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)