How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: the Fitting subgroup always contains its centralizer
Statement
False claim. For every finite group , one has .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Fitting subgroup and its centralizer in a finite group.
For , one has and (The Fitting subgroup of does not contain its centralizer).
If is finite and solvable, then (Philip Hall: in a finite solvable group the Fitting subgroup contains its own centralizer).
Refutation
For , [L1] gives and .
Thus the claimed inclusion fails for . The valid theorem [L2] has finite solvability as a hypothesis, and lies outside that hypothesis.
The strict failure in step 1.1 refutes the hypothesis-free claim.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- D. A. Craven, Finite Group Theory, Theorem 2.13 (standard reference, not scraped)