How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
False: circumference divided by radius equals pi
Statement
For every circle of radius , its circumference satisfies .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A radius .
A circle of radius satisfies , has diameter , and obeys (Every circle has circumference 2 pi r and circumference-to-diameter ratio pi).
The number is positive (Pi as twice the smallest positive zero of cosine).
Refutation
Since , division in [L1] gives .
By [L2], , so the asserted ratio is false.
The valid normalization is circumference divided by diameter: [L1] gives . The false statement omits this factor of .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 58 results over 16 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis II, section 11.4.3 (standard reference, not scraped)