How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Continuity, almost-everywhere differentiability, and an integrable derivative imply Newton--Leibniz
Statement
If is continuous, differentiable almost everywhere, and , then for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The standard Cantor--Lebesgue function .
Refutation
The function is continuous, satisfies and , and has derivative almost everywhere; thus .
Its endpoint increment is , whereas .
Thus the asserted every- reconstruction formula fails without an additional hypothesis such as AC.
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · 0 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.
Sources
- Christopher Heil, Absolute Continuity and the Banach--Zaretsky Theorem, §3.4 (standard reference, not scraped)