How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: every continuous preimage of a Lebesgue measurable subset of is Lebesgue measurable
Statement
Every continuous preimage of a Lebesgue measurable subset of is Lebesgue measurable.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice.
A continuous preimage of a Lebesgue measurable subset of can be nonmeasurable (A continuous preimage of a Lebesgue measurable subset of can be nonmeasurable).
Refutation
By [L1] choose a measurable subset and a continuous map whose preimage of is not measurable.
This witness refutes the universal claim.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John K. Hunter, Measure Theory (UC Davis lecture notes), Example 2.22 (standard reference, not scraped)