How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
De rham cohomology is a covariant functor
Statement
False claim: the pullback construction makes de Rham cohomology covariant.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: On the discrete three-point manifold , let swap and swap . Let be the indicator of .
De rham cohomology is a contravariant functor: De Rham cohomology is contravariant: for smooth and , , and .
Refutation
Every function on is smooth and closed, with no nonzero degree-zero boundaries, so represents itself in . Pullback is composition. Hence , while .
Thus these pullback operators do not commute, and cannot be replaced by . In general induces , with the reversed source and target, exactly as the contravariant functor theorem states.
Source locator
Lee, Proposition 17.2(a) and Corollary 17.3, p.442; explicit noncommuting permutation pullbacks supply the witness.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, second edition (standard reference, not scraped)