Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Direct sum and product totalisations are always isomorphic

Statement

False: Direct-sum and product totalisations are always isomorphic whenever both exist.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Direct sum total complex of a double complex and Product total complex of a double complex specify the diagonal objects and total differentials.

[F2]

Countable sequence groups and tail filtrations constructs S=(Z/2)(N) and P=(Z/2)N and proves that they have different cardinalities.

Refutation

Given: The infinite-diagonal witness of Sum and product totalisations can differ on infinite diagonals: Cj,−j=Z/2 for j≥0, every other component zero, and all arrows zero.

1.1F1F2

All double-complex identities hold because all maps vanish. The degree-zero direct-sum total object is S and the degree-zero product total object is P by [F1, F2]. Every other total degree is zero and both total differentials are zero. Thus both totalisations exist, with infinitely many nonzero summands on their sole nonzero diagonal.

2.1F2step 1.1∎

An isomorphism of these chain complexes would induce a bijection S→P, impossible because S is countably infinite and P is uncountable. The canonical comparison is also explicitly nonsurjective: the constant-one sequence lies in P and has infinite support, so is absent from S. This verifies the failed conclusion for abstract as well as canonical isomorphisms. All zero degrees and the index j=0 are included; the cardinality proof and this witness require no AC.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources