How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: every Borel measure on is finite on compact sets
Statement
False claim. Every Borel measure on is finite on compact sets. The finiteness-on-compacts hypothesis in the Lebesgue-Stieltjes correspondence is therefore a genuine hypothesis, not a consequence of being a Borel measure.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Counting measure on .
Counting measure is a measure on . (Counting measure is a measure)
Counting measure assigns an infinite set the value . (Counting measure on an arbitrary set)
Refutation
By [L1], counting measure restricts to a Borel measure on . The [L1, given] compact interval is infinite.
Therefore [L2] gives [step 1.1, L2] . So this Borel measure is not finite on the compact set , and the claim is false.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis, 2nd ed., Section 1.5 (standard reference, not scraped)