How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: every domain in C^n is a domain of holomorphy
Statement
Every domain in is a domain of holomorphy.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The punctured bidisc
The punctured bidisc is not holomorphically convex (The bidisc minus the origin is not holomorphically convex).
Refutation
The domain is a domain in , so it is one instance of the claimed class of domains in .
By [L1], this instance fails the expected several-variable convexity/domain-of-holomorphy package. In particular, the statement "every domain in is a domain of holomorphy" is already false in dimension .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jiří Lebl, Tasty Bits of Several Complex Variables, §1.6 and §2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Harold P. Boas, Lecture Notes on Several Complex Variables, §3.2.3 (standard reference, not scraped)