False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-16

How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every functor with a left adjoint also has a right adjoint

Statement

If a functor has a left adjoint, then it also has a right adjoint.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The underlying-set functor $U : G r p \to S e t$ .

[F1]

The free-group functor is a left adjoint of $U$ (The free-group functor is left adjoint to the underlying-set functor).

[F2]

Every left adjoint preserves colimits, including initial objects (Left adjoints preserve every colimit that exists).

[F3]

An initial object has exactly one morphism to every object (Initial object, terminal object, and zero object).

Refutation

technique · contradiction

1.1

By [F1], $U$ has a left adjoint. Suppose, as the claim predicts, that $U$ also has a right adjoint. Then $U$ itself is a left adjoint and preserves initial objects by [F2].

F1F2assume-contra

1.2

The trivial group is initial in $G r p$ , since there is exactly one homomorphism from it to every group. Its underlying set is a singleton.

F3algebra

2.1

The empty set, not a singleton, is initial in $S e t$ , so step 1.2 contradicts the preservation conclusion of step 1.1. Hence $U$ has no right adjoint and the statement is false.

step 1.1step 1.2F3discharge-contradiction∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 26 results over 10 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources

Emily Riehl, Category Theory in Context, 2nd ed., Example 4.1.10 (standard reference, not scraped)