How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: every nonzero germ is regular in the last variable without a coordinate change
Statement
False claim: every nonzero holomorphic germ is already regular in the last variable, without any coordinate change.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The false claim above.
The germ is not regular in at the origin ( is not regular in at the origin).
A linear shear can nevertheless make that same germ regular in (A linear shear makes regular in ).
Refutation
Fact [L1] gives a specific nonzero germ that fails the claimed property in the original coordinates.
Fact [L2] shows that the coordinate-change lemma is doing real work rather than decorating an already-true statement. Therefore the claim is false.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jiří Lebl, Tasty Bits of Several Complex Variables, Exercise 6.2.5 (standard reference, not scraped)