How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: every monoidal category is strict
Statement
False claim: every monoidal category is strict.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A skeleton of containing an infinite set with .
A strict monoidal category makes associativity and unit equalities literal and all constraints identities (Strict monoidal category).
In the Isbell skeleton example, forcing those identities collapses every endomorphism to the same map, which is absurd (Isbell's warning that isomorphic objects cannot simply be identified).
Refutation
If every monoidal category were strict, then the monoidal structure on that skeleton of would satisfy the condition in [L1].
But [L2] says that in this example such an identification forces all endomorphisms to be equal, contradicting the existence of distinct endomorphisms such as the identity and a constant map.
Therefore not every monoidal category is strict.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- S. Mac Lane, Categories for the Working Mathematician, Chapter VII.1 (standard reference, not scraped)