How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every reduction modulo p of an ordinary irreducible lattice stays irreducible
Statement
Every reduction modulo of an ordinary irreducible -lattice remains irreducible over .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A primitive cube root , the local cyclotomic triple and the standard -lattice
Reduction modulo the maximal ideal produces a -module (An OG-lattice is a finite free module over the valuation ring with G-action, and reduction modulo the maximal ideal produces a kG-module).
Refutation
The extension is totally ramified of degree , with uniformizer , valuation ring , and residue field . The field splits the subgroups of : it contains the values needed for the cyclic subgroups, and the trivial, sign, and standard representations split . If is a simple -module and generates the normal subgroup , then , so ; normality and simplicity give . Thus factors through and is trivial or sign. The same calculation handles the subgroups, so also splits all of them. Thus the displayed triple is a splitting -modular system, and the free rank-two module is an -lattice.
The scalar extension is the standard two-dimensional -module. It has no invariant line: a trivial line would be spanned by a constant vector, whose coordinate sum is zero only for the zero vector in characteristic ; and a sign line would have to be negated by both and , which the coordinate equations again force to be zero. Thus this ordinary representation is irreducible.
By [F1], reduction modulo gives the two-dimensional -module . The nonzero vector belongs to because it is the reduction of , and its line is fixed by . Hence is reducible.
This ordinary irreducible lattice has reducible reduction, so the universal statement is false.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory (23 Feb 2016 draft) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Leonard Tomczak, Local Fields - Lecture Notes (2022), cyclotomic extension example (standard reference, not scraped)