Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: every split group extension is a direct product

Statement

Every split group extension is an internal direct product.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The extension 1→C4→D4→C2→1 coming from the rotation subgroup and a reflection complement, in the convention that Dn has order 2n.

[L1]

A split extension is direct exactly when the complement centralizes the kernel (A split extension is a direct product exactly when its complement centralizes the kernel).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1givenL2

In D4=⟨r,s∣r4=s2=1, srs−1=r−1⟩, the subgroup ⟨r⟩≅C4 is normal and ⟨s⟩≅C2 is a complement, so the reverse implication of [L2] makes the extension split.

2.1L1step 1.1∎

But srs−1=r−1≠r, so the complement does not centralize the kernel. By [L1], the decomposition is not a direct product. Hence the claim is false.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources