Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: every split group extension is a direct product

Statement

Every split group extension is an internal direct product.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The extension 1C4D4C21 coming from the rotation subgroup and a reflection complement, in the convention that Dn has order 2n.

[L1]

A split extension is direct exactly when the complement centralizes the kernel (A split extension is a direct product exactly when its complement centralizes the kernel).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

In D4=r,sr4=s2=1, srs1=r1, the subgroup rC4 is normal and sC2 is a complement, so the reverse implication of [L2] makes the extension split.

givenL2
2.1

But srs1=r1r, so the complement does not centralize the kernel. By [L1], the decomposition is not a direct product. Hence the claim is false.

L1step 1.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources