How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: every subset is Carathéodory measurable for every outer measure
Statement
Every subset of every set is Carathéodory measurable for every outer measure on that set.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two-point set and the set function , for .
An outer measure on a set is a function that vanishes at the empty set, is monotone, and is countably subadditive. (Outer measures)
A set is Carathéodory measurable for when for every . (Carathéodory measurable sets)
Refutation
The function vanishes at and is monotone; if a countable union is nonempty, at least one member is nonempty, so the union has value and the sum of the member values is at least , while an empty union gives . Thus is an outer measure.
For and test set , [F2] would require , which is false.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- G. Folland, Real Analysis, 2nd ed., Section 1.4 (standard reference, not scraped)