How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: every degree- extension has exactly automorphisms
Statement
False claim. Every finite extension has .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The valid upper bound of is a group and and divisibility result of For a finite extension, divides .
has degree three and trivial automorphism group ( is separable and nonnormal with trivial automorphism group).
Refutation
The extension in [L1] has degree but automorphism-group order , so the two numbers are unequal.
The same witness satisfies the correct statements and , showing that equality, not the bound or divisibility, is the failed assertion.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- K. Conrad, The Galois Correspondence, Corollary 4.3 and examples (standard reference, not scraped)