How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The aleph equation carries no well-orderability assertion
Statement
False claim: “The equation says only that there is no intermediate size; it makes no assertion that can be well-ordered.” Here the equation is interpreted literally as equinumerosity with the indicated initial ordinal.
Refutation
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.
Under the stated interpretation, the equation asserts a bijection . Define iff in the ordinal order.
This is a linear order, and any nonempty family of subsets has a least member: take the inverse image of its image’s least ordinal. Thus the equation explicitly asserts well-orderability, refuting the claim. The equation is expressible in ZF; its being expressible does not remove this mathematical content.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Carneiro, §§1–2, comparison and well-orderability conventions (standard reference, not scraped)
- Caicedo, opening Specker theorem and powersets-of-ordinals theorem (standard reference, not scraped)