How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hamiltonian flows are complete on every symplectic manifold
Statement refuted
All Hamiltonian flows are complete.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The proposed universal claim.
Preservation of is asserted only wherever the local Hamiltonian flow exists. Hamiltonian flows preserve the symplectic form.
The convention defines the Hamiltonian field. Hamiltonian vector field and Hamiltonian function.
Refutation
On take . Writing , [F2] gives , so and . The solution from has and for .
This trajectory escapes to infinity as and cannot be extended to a curve in at time one. Thus the smooth Hamiltonian field is incomplete; [F1] never claimed otherwise.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ana Cannas da Silva, Lectures on Symplectic Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)