How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
False: Henstock–Kurzweil integrability implies Riemann integrability
Statement
False claim: Every Henstock–Kurzweil integrable function is Riemann integrable.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The false implication.
The indicator of the irrationals is Henstock–Kurzweil integrable with integral and is not Riemann integrable (The indicator of the irrationals is Henstock–Kurzweil integrable with integral ).
Refutation
Suppose the implication were true; [L1] gives a function satisfying its hypothesis but not its conclusion.
This contradiction refutes the implication, so the converse of the Riemann-to-HK theorem is false.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Alessandro Fonda, The Kurzweil-Henstock Integral for Undergraduates, Ch. 1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew Bruckner, Judith Bruckner and Brian Thomson, Real Analysis, Exercise 1:21.2 (standard reference, not scraped)