How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
False: a limit-computable function has a known stabilization stage
Statement
Every limit-computable function has a computable modulus of stabilization.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the standard stage approximation to the halting set.
Refutation
Let if program has halted by stage , and otherwise. Bounded simulation makes total computable, and it converges pointwise to the characteristic function of the halting set. Thus is limit computable.
Suppose had a total computable approximation with a computable stabilization modulus . Computing would then decide , contradicting undecidability of the halting problem. This argument covers every possible approximation, including from step 1.1, so no such modulus exists.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ludovic Patey, Computability Theory, §4.7 (standard reference, not scraped)