How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: a meromorphic function always equals the naive sum of its principal parts
Statement
False claim: A meromorphic function is always the pointwise sum of its principal parts, with no convergence-forcing corrections.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The principal parts at the positive integers.
Mittag-Leffler on the plane needs correction terms to force convergence (Mittag-Leffler on the complex plane).
Refutation
Fix any noninteger positive real . Then as .
Therefore the naive series has terms that do not tend to , so it diverges. This is exactly why the correction terms from [L1] are not optional in Mittag-Leffler's theorem.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Guide to Cultivating Complex Analysis, Example 9.4.3 (standard reference, not scraped)