How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every morphism that is both monic and epic is an isomorphism
Statement
FALSE. Every morphism that is both monic and epic is an isomorphism.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The unit-preserving ring inclusion .
The map is monic and epic in but is not an isomorphism (The inclusion is monic and epic but neither surjective nor an isomorphism in ).
Refutation
By [L1], satisfies both cancellation properties required of a monomorphism and an epimorphism.
The same result proves that has no inverse ring homomorphism and hence is not an isomorphism.
Thus is a morphism that is simultaneously monic and epic but not invertible, directly refuting the statement.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 41 results over 11 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emily Riehl, Category Theory in Context, Example 1.1.10 (standard reference, not scraped)