How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Objectwise isomorphisms X isomorphic to its double dual supply a pivotal structure
Statement
False claim. Objectwise isomorphisms supply a pivotal structure.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A semisimple multitensor category.
Left and right dual objects are isomorphic objectwise (Left and right dual objects are isomorphic in a semisimple multitensor category).
Pivotality requires coherent natural monoidal data, not objectwise existence (Objectwise double-dual isomorphisms do not supply a pivotal structure).
Refutation
[F1] produces isomorphisms separately for objects.
By [F2], these need not be natural in morphisms or multiplicative under tensor product. They therefore need not form a pivotal structure.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik, Tensor Categories, Question 4.8.3 (standard reference, not scraped)