How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
One fixed number of barycentric subdivisions makes every singular simplex cover small
Statement refuted
For every open cover there is one nonnegative integer such that is cover-small for every singular simplex .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Cover by and .
Subdivision preserves smooth chains and restricts to affine domain pieces (Barycentric subdivision and prism preserve smooth singular chains).
Subdivision is the recursive affine cone on the subdivided boundary (Barycentric subdivision operator).
Proof
For any proposed , define the smooth path , . In dimension one, the cone recursion gives the two half-interval parametrizations, one forward and one backward, with coefficient equal to their orientation sign. Inducting on subdivisions gives one affine parametrization of each dyadic interval , again with its orientation sign as coefficient: subdivision bisects each interval and the two new signs multiply its previous sign.
On a forward dyadic parametrization, becomes ; on a backward one it becomes . Therefore , where count forward and backward pieces and . The two maps are distinct because and , so no cancellation between them occurs in the free chain group. Each has image , which lies in neither nor . At least one nonzero basis coefficient therefore belongs to a non-small simplex, and the chain is not cover-small.
This proves failing the fixed cover's proposed bound; it does not assert that one simplex fails all bounds. For the witness is itself. Each witness has equal endpoints zero but is a nonconstant smooth simplex; repeated endpoint values cause no cancellation as step 2.1 checks. A constant simplex is already small. The empty chain is always small, and all formulas and witnesses are explicit without choice.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- DG-16 design; Hatcher/Park control (standard reference, not scraped)