Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: pk(n) is counted by (n−1k−1)

Statement

False claim: for all positive integers n and k,

pk(n)=(n−1k−1).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the case n=5 and k=3.

[L1]

The recurrence pk(n)=pk−1(n−1)+pk(n−k) holds for k≥1 (Exact-k partition recurrence).

[L2]

Compositions of n into k positive parts are counted by (n−1k−1) (Compositions of n into k positive parts are counted by (n−1k−1)).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1L1algebra

Using [L1], one gets p3(5)=p2(4)+p3(2)=2+0=2, corresponding to the two partitions 3+1+1 and 2+2+1.

1.2L2algebra

By [L2], one has (5−13−1)=(42)=6.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2∎

Steps 1.1 and 1.2 give p3(5)=2≠6=(42), so the displayed claim is false. The binomial coefficient counts ordered compositions, not unordered partitions.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources