How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: is counted by
Statement
False claim: for all positive integers and ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the case and .
The recurrence holds for (Exact-k partition recurrence).
Compositions of into positive parts are counted by (Compositions of into positive parts are counted by ).
Refutation
Using [L1], one gets , corresponding to the two partitions and .
By [L2], one has .
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 give , so the displayed claim is false. The binomial coefficient counts ordered compositions, not unordered partitions.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Alexander Hulpke, Combinatorics notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Darij Grinberg, Enumerative Combinatorics: class notes (standard reference, not scraped)