How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: every holomorphic function on a punctured several-variable domain is unbounded near the puncture
Statement
False claim: if and is holomorphic on a punctured neighborhood of , then must be unbounded near .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The bounded coordinate function on with .
A holomorphic function on a punctured several-variable domain extends holomorphically across the missing point (An isolated puncture is removable in complex dimension at least two).
Refutation
The function is holomorphic on and satisfies there, so it is bounded near the puncture.
Step 1.1 already contradicts the displayed claim, and [L1] explains why no singularity is hiding here: the function extends holomorphically across as the same coordinate function.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Tasty Bits of Several Complex Variables, §1.6 (standard reference, not scraped)