How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: every finite extension satisfies
Statement
Every finite extension satisfies .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The universal equality in the Statement.
The finite extension has ordinary degree and separable degree ( is purely inseparable of degree and separable degree one).
Refutation
Since every prime is greater than , the two degrees in [L1] are unequal.
This finite extension refutes the universal equality.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 29 results over 7 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- P. L. Clark, Field Theory, Chapter 4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, Fields and Galois Theory, Chapters 3 and 5 (standard reference, not scraped)