How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: is a combinatorial class even when has a size-zero object
Statement
False claim: is always a combinatorial class, even when has an object of size .
The theorem If has no size-zero objects then has generating function excludes exactly this case, and the exclusion is necessary.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The sequence construction (The sequence construction ) and its generating function theorem, which assumes that has no size-zero objects (If has no size-zero objects then has generating function ).
Refutation
Let with . Then for every , the length- sequence lies in and has total size .
These sequences are all distinct because their lengths differ, so the size- level of is infinite. Hence is not a combinatorial class.
The claim is therefore false, and the no-size-zero hypothesis in the sequence theorem is load bearing.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Philippe Flajolet and Robert Sedgewick, Analytic Combinatorics (standard reference, not scraped)