How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: On a complex inner product space, for every scalar
Statement
False claim. On a complex inner product space, for every scalar and linear map .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The identity map on standard and the scalar .
Adjoint algebra gives , not (Adjoints satisfy , , , and ).
The standard complex inner product is linear in its first argument and conjugate-linear in its second (The standard formulas on and on are inner products).
Refutation
By [L1], , which is not .
Directly, [L2] gives , confirming that the adjoint scalar must be .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 40 results over 10 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Sheldon Axler, Linear Algebra Done Right, 4th ed., result 7.5 (standard reference, not scraped)