How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: the argument principle ignores multiplicity
Statement
False claim: the argument principle counts zeros of a holomorphic function without multiplicity.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The function and the unit circle .
The argument principle counts zeros with multiplicity (The argument principle for an admissible null-homologous cycle).
Refutation
The function has exactly one distinct zero, namely , but that zero has multiplicity .
Applying [L1] on the unit circle gives So the argument principle returns , not the number of distinct zeros. The claim is false.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- R. W. Howell and J. H. Mathews, Complex Analysis, §8.7 (standard reference, not scraped)