How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: the underlying-set functor from topological spaces is monadic
Statement
False claim: the underlying-set functor is monadic.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The underlying-set functor on topological spaces.
Every monadic functor reflects isomorphisms (Every monadic functor is conservative).
A continuous bijection need not be a homeomorphism; the published false statement supplies a two-point witness (FALSE: every continuous bijection of topological spaces is a homeomorphism).
Topological spaces and continuous maps form the category (Topological spaces and continuous maps form the large locally small category ).
Refutation
By [L1], conservativity is necessary for the underlying-set functor to be monadic.
On , let be discrete and let have the Sierpiński topology . The identity function is a continuous bijection, but its inverse is not continuous because is open in and not in . This is the failure recorded in [L2] inside the category [L3].
The underlying function is an isomorphism in , while is not an isomorphism in because it is not a homeomorphism. Thus does not reflect this isomorphism.
The functor is not conservative by step 2.1 and therefore cannot be monadic by step 1.1.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- D. Mehrle, Category Theory Part III, Example 5.20(e) (standard reference, not scraped)
- E. Riehl, Category Theory in Context, 2nd ed., Section 5.6 (standard reference, not scraped)