Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

LHS defines low-degree group cohomology

Statement

The LHS spectral sequence defines the groups H1(G,M) and H2(G,M), without an earlier definition of group cohomology.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The library's derived-invariants convention, with DC or supplied comparison data.

[F1]

Group cohomology is defined from invariants of a supplied injective resolution (Group cohomology as a derived functor).

[F2]

Invariants compose through the quotient, and LHS applies the derived-composite construction to those already defined functors (Invariants for a group extension compose, Lyndon-Hochschild-Serre spectral sequence).

Refutation

1.1

For a supplied resolution MI, F1 defines H1(G,M)=ker((I1)G(I2)G)/im((I0)G(I1)G) and similarly uses degrees one, two and three for H2. No group extension occurs in either definition. DC supplies the stated resolution-independent notation, while the displayed quotient for specified data is already defined in ZF. F2 uses these derived functors to identify both its page and its target.

F1F2
2.1

The trivial extension 11G1G1 makes the proposed independent definition visibly circular. Trivial-group invariants are the identity functor, so applied to an exact resolution their positive cohomology is zero and their degree-zero cohomology is M. The LHS second page is therefore E2p,0=Hp(G,M) and zero elsewhere; its target is the same Hp(G,M). In particular the entries at (1,0) and (2,0) already contain the groups allegedly being defined. LHS supplies a computation and comparison tool, not the missing definition. For zero coefficients all displayed quotients are zero, with the same dependency order.

F1F2step 1.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources