How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: the real numbers are algebraically closed
Statement
False claim: the field is algebraically closed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The polynomial .
A field is algebraically closed exactly when every nonconstant polynomial over it has a root in the field (An algebraically closed field: every nonconstant polynomial has a root in the field).
The polynomial is irreducible in ( is irreducible over ).
Refutation
By [L2], the polynomial has no real root.
Therefore fails the defining property in [L1] for algebraic closedness.
So the real numbers are not algebraically closed.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Thomas W. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, extension fields (standard reference, not scraped)
- P. L. Clark, Field Theory, Chapters 3 to 5 (standard reference, not scraped)