How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
False: vector line integrals are invariant under reversing a path
Statement
For every continuous vector field and piecewise- path on whose trace it is defined,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The constant field and the segment on .
On a path , the vector line integral is the integral of (Scalar line integrals with respect to arc length and vector-field line integrals).
An orientation-reversing reparametrization negates a vector line integral but leaves a scalar integral unchanged (Scalar line integrals are parametrization-independent; vector line integrals retain orientation and change sign when it reverses).
The integral of a constant on is (If on then for every partition ; in particular every constant function is integrable, with ).
Refutation
Since , [L1] and [L3] give .
The reversal is orientation-reversing, so [L2] gives .
Since , the statement is false. The scalar analogue is true because [L2] says that removes the orientation sign.
Depends on
- Scalar line integrals are parametrization-independent; vector line integrals retain orientation and change sign when it reverses
- Scalar line integrals with respect to arc length and vector-field line integrals
- If $m \le f \le M$ on $[a,b]$ then $m(b-a) \le L(f,P) \le \underline{\int_a^b} f \le \overline{\int_a^b} f \le U(f,P) \le M(b-a)$ for every partition $P$; in particular every constant function is integrable, with $\int_a^b c = c(b-a)$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 84 results over 18 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis II, Proposition 9.2.15 (standard reference, not scraped)