How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
If , then the second derivative test still decides whether is an extremum
Statement
False claim: If , then the value of decides whether is a local minimum, a local maximum, or neither.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The functions , , and at .
The second derivative test is silent when (The second-derivative test for strict local extrema).
The first nonzero derivative test classifies the three functions by their first nonzero derivatives (The first nonzero higher derivative classifies a stationary point).
Refutation
Direct differentiation gives and .
Yet with equality only at , so has a strict minimum; , so has a strict maximum; and changes sign, so has neither.
The identical second-derivative data lead to all three outcomes, refuting the claim.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 69 results over 18 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- MIT OpenCourseWare 18.100B Real Analysis, Spring 2025 lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis I, Taylor's theorem and related calculus (standard reference, not scraped)
- University of Minnesota MATH 5615, higher derivative test (standard reference, not scraped)